As your second response to the non-fiction piece you chose, please comment on this post with at least 5 well-thought out and complete sentences. You should respond in the same way we have been in class by using sentence stems to start your sentences.
Your response will be divided into two parts.
Part one will provide at least one sentence addressing the main ideas presented in your reading.
Part two will provide a summary of your reading (including the 5 W's/H).
Checklist for response:
*5 sentences minimum (well-thought out and referring to the text)
*sentences begin with stems
*main ideas of the piece are stated in at least one complete sentence
*summary is provided including the 5 W's/H
* reference information using format given
Rubric:
100: all of the above is accomplished in the response
90: meets minimum requirement of sentences, but is lacking in some way elsewhere
80: is lacking 2 of the above requirements
70: is lacking 3 of the above requirements
50: lacking more than three of the above requirements
Your response will be divided into two parts.
Part one will provide at least one sentence addressing the main ideas presented in your reading.
Part two will provide a summary of your reading (including the 5 W's/H).
Checklist for response:
*5 sentences minimum (well-thought out and referring to the text)
*sentences begin with stems
*main ideas of the piece are stated in at least one complete sentence
*summary is provided including the 5 W's/H
* reference information using format given
Rubric:
100: all of the above is accomplished in the response
90: meets minimum requirement of sentences, but is lacking in some way elsewhere
80: is lacking 2 of the above requirements
70: is lacking 3 of the above requirements
50: lacking more than three of the above requirements